|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
840
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Look at the angry mob of poors in this thread.
Guess what this change means to all of you:
You'll still be poor because you don't have the foresight, drive, or motivation to go after the things that stop you from being poor.
We'll be backstroking through our 9 trillion isk that we've made off our moons while you all try to figure out whats the next best thing to do (that we'll already be well on our way to controlling). |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
840
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
balgara wrote: why not just make moon goo npc only at a set price..then when goon's throw a big fit in jita why not have the caldari navy blow the hell out of them and destroy their assets..that would be funny as hell..
In a nonshocker, heres a rather bitter homless man who's home we just seized. Try not to touch him as we move past, he's not washed in a few days.
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Look at the angry mob of poors in this thread. Grath "Vibrant Drone Regions" Telkin arrives in the thread.
Careful, you're posting on a public forum, you're looking at quite a hefty fine from your alliance. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
842
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Look at the angry mob of poors in this thread.
Guess what this change means to all of you:
You'll still be poor because you don't have the foresight, drive, or motivation to go after the things that stop you from being poor.
We'll be backstroking through our 9 trillion isk that we've made off our moons while you all try to figure out whats the next best thing to do (that we'll already be well on our way to controlling). does that mean alex will stop giving you reacharounds and you can actually be a merc alliance again? or did test win you over with man love? ANGRY POOR SPOTTED
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
845
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Goon tears incomming, well done CCP, thanks for fixing this design failure that has been exploited too long :)
ahahahahahahaha
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
845
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Goon tears incomming, well done CCP, thanks for fixing this design failure that has been exploited too long :) ahahahahahahaha i would stfu, if my alliance fc's lead fleets full of goon shitheads only because he can suck mittens tech ****** ;)
Oh man, you are so angry about being poor its amazing. Please, tell me more about why you would 'stfu', is it because your alliance is under an internally enforced posting ban because you generally as a whole are so incredibly bad at it.
I guess the fact that you live in your space because Goons let you is starting to bother you a bit.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
846
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Goon tears incomming, well done CCP, thanks for fixing this design failure that has been exploited too long :) ahahahahahahaha i would stfu, if my alliance fc's lead fleets full of goon shitheads only because he can suck mittens tech ****** ;) Oh man, you are so angry about being poor its amazing. Please, tell me more about why you would 'stfu', is it because your alliance is under an internally enforced posting ban because you generally as a whole are so incredibly bad at it. I guess the fact that you live in your space because Goons let you is starting to bother you a bit. sorry you'r wrong we had one year of tech and our corp is so incredible rich now, you cant believe it :D
As if AAA would let its crappy pet alliance keep a tech moon.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
846
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Grath Telkin wrote: ...
As if AAA would let its crappy pet alliance keep a tech moon.
check alliance history if you need to smack
You're only as good as your last fight, and well, it doesn't matter what alliance you were in, you are in Engarde, the renter alliance that the other renter alliances make fun of.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
846
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:
btw funny to see that renter mining and santum running alliance has more kills this month than elite legion :D (think evekill counts npc kills too)
Remember what you always tell Goon, its not quantity that matters, its quality.
You killed a bunch of drakes, we killed lokis tengus and a nyx. Sorry you can't replace them as fast as the drakes get replaced, maybe soon you'll ease up on the straw and get with the program.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
846
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:
btw funny to see that renter mining and santum running alliance has more kills this month than elite legion :D (think evekill counts npc kills too)
Remember what you always tell Goon, its not quantity that matters, its quality. You killed a bunch of drakes, we killed lokis tengus and a nyx. Sorry you can't replace them as fast as the drakes get replaced, maybe soon you'll ease up on the straw and get with the program. yeah thats why this noobs still killed 100b more ;) and talking of quality while shadoo fcs drakefleets is kinda ironic :D
Shadoo hasn't fc'd a drake fleet in days, you're dying to DBRB and DurrHurrDurr.
Let that sink in for a bit.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
847
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:
yes my style of pros is horrible... but still that should not detract from the point that cfc has turned into what they fought to kill all those years ago... its like how luke lashed out at darth and then ended up turing to the dark side in episode 7.
Yea, how exactly are they like BOB, please enumerate the likenesses, spelling errors will of course be ignored in your 'special case'.
We'll wait right here while you get them together.
|
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
849
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:MeBiatch wrote:
yes my style of pros is horrible... but still that should not detract from the point that cfc has turned into what they fought to kill all those years ago... its like how luke lashed out at darth and then ended up turing to the dark side in episode 7.
Yea, how exactly are they like BOB, please enumerate the likenesses, spelling errors will of course be ignored in your 'special case'. We'll wait right here while you get them together. oh thank you grath... i do apprichiate looking over my lack of using spell check... :) well back in the day bob said to goons this is our game and goons were like we are fun loving guys so we dont like how you are all about leet pvp so well rifter gang bang you to death... but then something changed when goons gost disbanded and all the good leaders went to ccp... they became what they hated... the new bob... they are the richest peeps who are not telling people litterally this is thier game and we all have to just accept that... well i do hope that now the tech bro love fest will die and that will mean that goons can go back to thier roots and become just as terrible as they once were... and when most of eve lubed them for it... I mean if RA can s[lit how many times and they eneded up in a death match... could we not eventually see goons fight test? though for PL you guys never change even when you were merc alliance all those years ago... your still sucling on the richest persons bosums... so kol ha kavod to you for staying true to your morals...
So to clear this post up, I asked you to describe how Goons have become like BoB and your answer is "Because they got disbanded"....
How am I not supposed to call you dumb?
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
851
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:31:00 -
[12] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Grath Telkin wrote: So to clear this post up, I asked you to describe how Goons have become like BoB and your answer is "Because they got disbanded"....
How am I not supposed to call you dumb?
well when one suffers from selective reading its rather hard to come to anyother conclusion...
Ok feel free to point out all the reasons you detailed in the post i quoted about why goons are like BoB, I mean, maybe i didn't see all the reasons you listed out, OR, maybe you really didn't list any reasons at all why they're like bob and you're actually just sperging tard
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
852
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:38:00 -
[13] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:
you grath perhaps i should not have turned down your offer of man love... you seem to be a rather strict but sensual lover...
So this is your way of admitting you're an idiot and can't come up with any real ways that Goons have turned into BoB then?
I'll take it, since you're barely literate as it is and we dont need to push you into doing something drastic. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
853
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:47:00 -
[14] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:
now good sir we knew i was an idiot before i started to post so no need to get personal...
kind sir why be upset that your new overloards are like you old ones...
only difference i can see is sir molle had better style and was not as racist... oh and right now goons dont chuck thier meat shields away...
but come the nerf i and when you guys are fighting against goons again i suspect that goons will start to treat thier allies (pets) just like the GBC did...
Ok this is all your own personally distorted opinions on what makes somebody a racist and 'style' but not an actual list of similarities between BoB and Goons.
I mean, you do have a list right, theres no way that you're just standing here screaming that "GOONS ARE BOB" without any actual facts right?
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
853
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:47:00 -
[15] - Quote
heh, who am I kidding, of course you are |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
855
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 20:22:00 -
[16] - Quote
Fiberton wrote:Rumors without accompanying evidence will be removed. - ISD Tyrozan.. The Chatter is all getting around...The community will find out about the people who no longer work at CCP and play eve within the CFC. Atleast that is what the eve community hears. Would CCP lie to us about it ? It would not be CCPs faulty anyway not 100%. I assume these ex employees signed NDAs but once they no longer work for you...DO you think they will hold to them ? I think not but... regardless this nerf is great and I am glad CCP is doing something about the re-balance. Here goes another 8 years of EVE :) The simple fix for that is to flip it to something else and the ill gotten intel is worthless simple Fly safe. PS ISD Tyrozan The truth will come out. If this is either true or false the answer always comes out. I personally have no damn Idea. But you think it is just coincidence ? MeBiatch wrote:Tippia wrote:In before GÇ£but all those lower-tier moons are in newly claimed CFC space! Raaahrr CCPSwarm!GÇ¥  and here we all thought that test was only looking for good fights? -snip-
Rumors without accompanying evidence will be removed. - ISD Tyrozan
This is a mindbogglingly stupid post, even for eve.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
855
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 20:33:00 -
[17] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:This is a mindbogglingly stupid post, even for eve. Not quite "Vibrant drone regions" or "supercap nerf won't change us" stupid though. Your trophy is safe.
Hey, as far as i can see, the drone regions are pretty vibrant, theres a sea of life up near the top right now and near daily fighting (more than can be said for your coalition) and they nerfed supers and somehow my group still beat the **** out of your group.
Try not to be too sad, you've only wracked up about 300 million in fines for public posting |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
855
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 20:51:00 -
[18] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Continuing his perfect badpost track record, Grath Telkin conflates the present post-compound post-Dodger drone regions with the situation it was in when he made the statement.
450 million |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
857
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 21:13:00 -
[19] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:yeah, if mining raw cobalt and platinum is only slightly less proftable then transmuting them to Technetium, that means alchemy+ at razor-slim profit margins is barely more efficient then technetium trade which is saddled by a markup of thousands of percentage. which means this solves very little except capping tech prices at their present value which CCP Fozzy described as "broken".
Much like your alliances push a few months ago to go harass towers, you just don't get it.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
861
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 21:35:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:yeah, if mining raw cobalt and platinum is only slightly less proftable then transmuting them to Technetium, that means alchemy+ at razor-slim profit margins is barely more efficient then technetium trade which is saddled by a markup of thousands of percentage. which means this solves very little except capping tech prices at their present value which CCP Fozzy described as "broken". Much like your alliances push a few months ago to go harass towers, you just don't get it. Whether it's some POS push my alliance never participated in or some posting fee that doesn't exist, keeping track of the incoherent hallucinations ("Vibrant drone regions") you assert as reality is difficult to follow. You're to credibility what MeBiatch is to spelling.
So you're saying that FAIL didn't deploy north to "harass" tech moons and then not manage to do a single thing for 3 weeks, then pack up and go home?
I mean, if it wont get moderated out i can post every alliance meeting and mail you've had in your little gutter dwelling scrub alliance for the past 6 months, or even better your alliance meeting that literally everybody in EVE's 0.0 population has sat around laughing about from last weekend where you fine gentlemen discussed all the fines that are levied from talking in local and forum posting.
Oh hey look heres one now:
Quote:Re: DO NOT TALK IN LOCAL From: Arch-ûeb-¦ld Hornby Sent: 2012.06.28 14:15 To: Ca-òcade Imminent
From now on an increasing fine goes to anyone saying anything but GF in local when neuts are present. 1st offense : 50m 2nd offense : 250m 3rd offense : 800m
If anyone sees anyone doing this mail GAGS Pevi a picture
-Archie
Yea, totally sounds like I'm making things up
Man your alliance sure does sound like fun, being told when you're allowed to talk and where sure is the pinnacle of videogame fun! |
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
863
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 22:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Yea, totally sounds like I'm making things up Yea it kind of does when you claim that "forum posting results in a fine" and post an unrelated e-mail about forbidding in-game chat in local. You see Grath, this is an internet browser, not an in-game EVE channel hth
http://soundcloud.com/theybemadlolololol/fail-alli-meeting-july06
You go through it again, I'm not sifting through that **** twice, but its in there, 2000 other people have listened (and laughed) at it.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
863
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 22:24:00 -
[22] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Yea, totally sounds like I'm making things up Yea it kind of does when you claim that "forum posting results in a fine" and post an unrelated e-mail about forbidding in-game chat in local. You see Grath, this is an internet browser, not an in-game EVE channel hth http://soundcloud.com/theybemadlolololol/fail-alli-meeting-july06You go through it again, I'm not sifting through that **** twice, but its in there, 2000 other people have listened (and laughed) at it. I'm at work at the moment; just read the list of rules on our forum which you doubtlessly have mirrored: no rule on forum posting.
Ok real talk: Doesn't it bother you that you even had to check? I mean christ what kind of dickheads do you play with that they think they have the ability to dictate what and when and where you can speak? Whats more, why would you listen to them?
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
870
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 01:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
Crexa wrote:
In essence, this reduces the cost of ships/modules across the board f
Why reduce the cost? Eve is finally cycling back around to where, for the common player, loss actaully matters. If the moon goo is finally removed as a passively accumulated material then all will be right with the world
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
871
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 02:03:00 -
[24] - Quote
Crexa wrote:
Because that seems to be one of the, if not stated, implied goals. If not I have mis-interpreted what they are attempting.
I think its more that they want to stop the few of us who have fought and clawed our way into owning these moons, then schmoozed each other into removing any threat to said moons from having such a hard lock on the economy.
The bleed off from the fixes will take years to even out but its a needed step, as the financial power that can be brought to bear by just a few holders right now is pretty insane.
To give you an idea, my alliance has taken in about 9 trillion (with a T) isk since we first took our moons a year and a half ago. We have put that to fairly devastating use by buying just about every member of the alliance (still have a few without) supers and or titans, dreads, and carriers, and generally spreading it around the members to make sure we have no poors in the alliance overall.
And my estimate is conservative.
Its not any rule or cheating we've done to achieve this, its just the natural workings of war and politics in 0.0 and the balance needs to be returned since we've ridden this for about as long as we can.
And we've been crying for it to change since September of last year, but were constantly shocked and amazed that patch after patch the tech was left alone.
Well, now they have Fozzie, stunningly handsome man that he is, and it looks like he's going to fix it.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
885
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 02:32:00 -
[25] - Quote
Little Fistter wrote: Right now you are giving the dominant alliances all the power.
Excuse me little...eh..man..
They didn't give us anything. We took it from the 65,000 player coalition that held it before us then we turned it into something more than what they were doing with it.
Sorry that it doesn't fit your jaded view of reality but thats actually what happened with it. Nobody was given anything...
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
890
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 03:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
Andrea Griffin wrote:
I'm putting my money on #2. I like this; this is a good thing. Thank you. Alchemy is an interesting, market driven solution to supply issues in Eve.
You left out option 3:
Everybody is saying "about frickin time" |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
899
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 08:32:00 -
[27] - Quote
Dilly Dallyer2 wrote:One totaly unrelated game mechanic that could also break the Tech monopoly would be to make standings based on player actions, not just a click of a button. Too much of the game is blue to each other. Indiscretions done to an Alliance should not be so easily forgotten. To stop this from being exploited by Awoxres this would need personal, corp and Alliance standings exactly like is done with NPC agents/Corps/Factions. If your personal standings towards an alliance you are in drop to a certain point, you get a warning, if they drop lower you loose all roles, if they drop bellow a set threshold you get a 24 hour warning that you are being automaticaly kicked from your corporation.
END this mass of iveryone being blue. blob warefare needs to be attacked from every direction.
this is quite possibly the most ******** idea put in print.
ever
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
905
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 19:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Little Fistter wrote: Right now you are giving the dominant alliances all the power.
Excuse me little...eh..man.. They didn't give us anything. We took it from the 65,000 player coalition that held it before us then we turned it into something more than what they were doing with it. Sorry that it doesn't fit your jaded view of reality but thats actually what happened with it. Nobody was given anything... one could say that the dominant alliances were not dominant alliances until they took those things timeline PL allies with drone peeps and raiden to take out the nothern coalition... they then set thier eyes on cfc but that fails HARD! Eventually when it looks like raiden and friends cant hold thier space... PL get an offer fro CFC saying we will let you keep your Tech moons if you play nice and fight for us... so yeah... no one gave you tech PL... but you are now a member of the cfc and mittenz allowed you to keep them... so admit it if you step out of line you loose your tech and loose your reinbursement program and then fighting becomes an actual risky adventure... as a first step alchemy is a good one... i am more interested in how they are going to rebalance tech II production costs... thats going to be the real Tech nerf...
Your timeline is off by a little, you forgot we've owned these tech twice, we took about 70 tech moons before the drone lands even started their war, one the NC massed its 65000 heartbeats and pointer fingers we lost them all over about 2 months with the Y- welp being the peak of the action where 1300 guys engaged a 65000 man coalition in their supers (and got curb stomped for it).
We then took the contract from IT to distract Goons which didn't go so well even though we made moderate gains on moons and CSAA's it was too little too late to save IT. And that would be a 1300 man alliance taking on the deklien coalition alone.
We would then return and start retaking the same moons about a month later and get hired in the process by the advancing droneland forces.
So i guess in reality your timeline isn't really accurate at all, along with your jaded opinion of the facts. I mean you could at least put a little effort and creativity into your hurf blurf.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
907
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 19:41:00 -
[29] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:
you wont see goons doing active ring mining ops and then giving their hard earned isk to you just for nothing...
This doesn't happen now, so why would it happen then?
Are you mentally ill?
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
910
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 23:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Lord Zim wrote:MeBiatch wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Death before online requirement for singleplayer games. :colbert: sure and when d3 becomes a single player game sure thing It is. They've apparently managed to fool you into thinking that D3 actually must have an always-on internet connection to run the logic, but there's no part of the game (while you're not playing with others) which should in any way, shape or form require external resources. Nada. Zip. Zilch. I'll bet you're one of the people who thinks IW were right to remove lean, console, mods and dedicated servers, too. Nah im one of those guys who likes to play games and does not take them too seriously... You on the other hand...
Ah the post of a man bested in rightful word to word combat.
Your surrender is noted and accepted, please move to the back of the bus.
|
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
915
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 08:11:00 -
[31] - Quote
Kaycerra wrote:[quote=Gunner]
Also, a little upset to see Fozzy having the nerve to ask for likes, in the face of the fact that there is no dislike button, for all of us to express our dislike for the way the situation is being handled, or the extremely vague nature of the blog, or the fact that alchemy isn't going to do anything.
Yea i guess it was better when they weren't doing anything at all right?
I mean damn him for even bothering to put out the effort and try and do anything at all right?
He probably should have just sat around doing nothing about it like it has been for the last 3 years until he had a detailed explanation written just for you that had bullet points and exact time tables for completion.
Maybe they'll put a dislike button in and people can hammer it enough times to stop people like you from ever posting again. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
921
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 16:20:00 -
[32] - Quote
Inspiration wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Inspiration wrote:Now, if they were to redistribute moon minerals for example, that would be another matter at all! redistributing moon minerals is dumb when there's 180k moons in the game that can potentially be mined if your idea of a balanced game is "the game rolls 1d20 for me every x months and i might get a personal tech moon in the process!" well it's not How does that differ from changing the materials needed in T2 production, like they did before? Which costed me around 25b in reaction input stock i had at the time? If that was is legitimate change, then redistributing moon minerals once so that not all stuff sits in one particular place, certainly is too!
How do you not understand how much moon scanning sucks?
What language does that need to be put in for you?
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
921
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 16:42:00 -
[33] - Quote
Inspiration wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Inspiration wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Inspiration wrote:Now, if they were to redistribute moon minerals for example, that would be another matter at all! redistributing moon minerals is dumb when there's 180k moons in the game that can potentially be mined if your idea of a balanced game is "the game rolls 1d20 for me every x months and i might get a personal tech moon in the process!" well it's not How does that differ from changing the materials needed in T2 production, like they did before? Which costed me around 25b in reaction input stock i had at the time? If that was is legitimate change, then redistributing moon minerals once so that not all stuff sits in one particular place, certainly is too! How do you not understand how much moon scanning sucks? What language does that need to be put in for you? You are just plain lazy and want a static environment, meaning you should not even play a game like EVE that undergoes so many changes over its lifetime!
If I'm lazy you're an idiot, hows that fit for you ?
EVE has been around for SOO many years and guess what, Moon mining is so damn tedious that there is not one single complete record of every moon in the game.
8 years, in a relatively unchanging environment and no one has scanned all the moons.
So am I lazy or are you ignorant of what moon scanning entails?
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
930
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 22:34:00 -
[34] - Quote
Dr 0wnage wrote:.
This system could allow WH systems to produce goo as well making moon surveying in unknown space a profession.
..
Yea what harm could come from a money fountain that springs up in a wormhole thats completely unassailable right?
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
936
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 09:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
Inspiration wrote:
Most scanning is done already anyways, in search of combat anomalies.
What, no its not, its an entirely different probe type and process
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
941
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 05:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
You aren't getting a response because the inventory is fine for everybody with an IQ above 14.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
944
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 15:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Goonswarm leadership has been advocating for a Technetium nerf for a very long time - and now that it actually comes they are all mad about CCP removing valuable content from the game?
lolwut
Ok genius, whats left to fight over after this?
Owning space sucks, its boring, thankless, and nothing more than a burden. CCP destroyed the value of space by adding in the anoms, so true sec matters far less now days. I mean you have alliances like AAA and CVA who keep where they live by default since nobody else in the game wants the space. The 'dumbing down' of space has already greatly reduced the need for conflict around EVE, the moons were one of the last great content creators.
Now that will be gone, what are we supposed to fight over? The entire south already avoids SOV fights of any kind, its just not financially worth the effort.
Now the game over can enjoy what they do because theres no real reason to do anything else.
Its not the money leaving that matters, its the things to fight over being diminished one more time.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
944
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 20:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
Hammer Legion Member wrote:so apparently, its not worth doing anything without beeing "financially worth it", but you totally dont care about the money... right? 
I guess you play a different game than everybody else, EVERYTHING in eve is financially motivated, I know you know that and are being purposefully obtuse but I'll put it in print anyway.
People in 0.0 never have fought "just for ***** and giggles" , everything is weighed for its potential gain and or loss and if there is nothing to gain then there will BE no fights and 0.0 will stagnate worse than it is now.
While we realize this will be a multi stage release, the boredom of 0.0 wont make it until some november release, we need MORE things to drive conflicts NOW not later, and taking the last thing left out isn't really the best idea.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
945
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 22:28:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Grath Telkin wrote: While we realize this will be a multi stage release, the boredom of 0.0 wont make it until some november release, we need MORE things to drive conflicts NOW not later, and taking the last thing left out isn't really the best idea.
I completely agree that some space being better than other space is good game design. But the game doesn't need 180k tech to have conflict. Tech is now only 5x the value of the second best moon instead of 11x. The profit there isn't disappearing, it's moving to other activities that people can get involved in. Arguing that we need 100k+ tech so the moons will drive conflict is like saying we need remote AOE doomsdays so that CSAAs will drive conflict. Sometimes game balance is just game balance.
Ok i still love you but I'm right.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
945
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 23:28:00 -
[40] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Once upon a time all it took to generate conflict was a prophet foreseeing the destruction of an alliance and fulfilling his own prophecy. I don't believe those days are gone.
Ok you win you're right, prophets are pretty damn amazing (especially tall dark haired ones).
Ruiryu wrote:I think it is funny how the OTECH guys are crying buckets over this change and saying it's the only thing that fuels conflicts. When it is really only fueling a one sided war where the rest of EVE suffers.
These changes are right on the money to bring things back inline to where things need to be at not where you want them to be at. Suck it up.
I dont think you quite understand the point some of us are making but feel free to be all smug.
We'll suck it up through a 9 trillion isk straw. |
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
945
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 01:25:00 -
[41] - Quote
Hammer Legion Member wrote: Did Technetium @ 200k ever do what your predicting?.
Yes actually, virtually every big fight up north over the past 5 months has been over a tech moon, and there have been TONS of fights over those moons. Everybody wanted a shot at those moons and just about everybody took a shot, Including AAA doing a field trip north from the the far southern half of the game to fight over them.
Bloodpetal wrote: When Ring mining comes out there will be.
They will be called MINERS. They will be players that mine. And they will be out there mining. And then people will want to kill them.
No, actually they wont die, their scout 2 jumps over will have reported incoming hostiles long before the miners themselves are ever in danger and they'll then POS up or dock up thanks to the 20 large bubbles they'll anchor on their ingates.
Glad to see you play EVE in 0.0.
Ione Hawke wrote:
It is my impression that at the moment tech is a major reason why alliances avoid conflict.
Your impression is wrong, people fight over the moons, this week alone there have been daily fights over tech moons. Your just listening to the one side crying loudest because they didn't have the foresight that the other side had.
Ione Hawke wrote:It makes perfect sense to form a technetium cartel,
Right, its player driven content, you know, what EVE is allegedly built around, only, for the entire summer CCP's main goal seems to be to undo all of the player driven content in EVE, from Incursions, to Hulkageddon, to the Tech Cartel.
Ione Hawke wrote:It is also obvious that other non-tech alliances pose no threat. Will there be an coalition that does in half a year? In a year perhaps? I wonder, is complete stagnation in null during this period, while otec banks isk, good for the game?
We banked the isk for a year an a half, at any point in time during that year an a half the rest of the game could have gotten together and ....wait for it...created some content by working closely enough together to undo what we were working towards. OTEC is only about 4 months old, prior to that we were largely opposed to each other.
Everything most people are basing their opinions on is largely based off of southern bloc posters who are frustrated at recent failures which they're unable to attribute to their coalition leaders.
Instead of doing what we did, working within the game mechanics to enact change, they've taken the tried and true method of crying until the developers change the game.
Only this wont help them since we've all amassed such wealth and a working infrastructure with Jabbers and join comms and shared intel, that nothing the developers do short of purposely disbanding the OTEC alliances will make s difference for years to come.
|

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
946
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 06:22:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ione Hawke wrote:
Ok, you did some nice selective quoting there. Certainly you won't call Nulli/BL skirmishing and grabbing a tech from Goons a credible threat to your monopoly, do you? I merely argued that tech/otec prevents conflict *at this moment*.
Way to move your goal posts, now it needs to be a credible threat?
No other group in eve has the organizational skills that the CFC has, so there is no such thing as a credible threat to a group that can mobilize 3 full fleets of people at the drop of a hat. Whats next, nerf the size of alliance and the length of your standings list?
That wasn't selective quoting, that was addressing the points, people said nobody attacks the tech, or even takes the tech, which is an outright lie, the moons are under a fairly constant attack from one group or another.
You should come out and say what you really want, which is a nerf to the organizational skills of the OTEC group, because thats what you keep losing to. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
950
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 17:22:00 -
[43] - Quote
Hammer Legion Member wrote:
@ Grath I agree that there have been fights in the past over tech moons (mostly between current OTEC parties btw.) and you kinda deserved to milk them to some degree, but come on, thats almsot 2 years ago now, double-digit trillions is enough to play for a while.
The worst part of your moaning is, that nobody is taking your tech moons away...you are basicly just crying about the fact,that you cant exploit your monopoly position anymore since you wont be the only one provinding PlaTe .... nothing else is happening to you, you still get your fair price for your tech, but thats apparently not enough.
To be clear, I'm not upset that Tech is getting nerfed, you know the PL model, and you know that I dont personally own a tech moon, I have my Titan and could really care less about the financial aspect of the issue.
Mainly i was concerned about fight generation, people aren't likely to sling billion at things worth a pittance, but as Fozzie reminded me, once upon a time people burned space just because they could.
So maybe they'll give me destructable stations and a pack of matches and turn me loose. |
|
|
|